Instructions for use provided to deployers: Which item | AIGP
7-day money-back guarantee — full refund within 7 days of purchase if you've completed under 20% of the questions. See pricing →
Certifications Tools Flashcards Career Paths Exam Guides Blog Pricing For Teams About

Language

✓ EnglishDeutschEspañolFrançaisPortuguês
Check readiness — free →

Instructions for use provided to deployers: Which item is a public/transparency disclosure aligned with that

AIGP Understanding How to Govern AI Development Easy

Instructions for use, technical documentation, and post-market monitoring plans are the transparency disclosures named in the objective.

The question

A provider must meet transparency obligations for its high-risk AI system by making appropriate disclosures. It wants to give deployers what they need to operate the system safely and lawfully. Which item is a public/transparency disclosure aligned with that obligation?

Preparing for AIGP? Take the free 5-min readiness quiz →

  1. The internal source code repository and proprietary model weights, released openly so that anyone can inspect precisely how the system reaches its decisions.
    Transparency obligations do not require publishing source code or weights; they require documentation and usage information, not full disclosure of proprietary internals.
  2. Instructions for use provided to deployers, together with technical documentation and a post-market monitoring plan for the deployed system.
    Instructions for use, technical documentation, and post-market monitoring plans are exactly the transparency disclosures the objective names for meeting these obligations.
  3. The employment contracts of the engineering team, disclosed to show that qualified personnel with clear accountability built and maintain the deployed system.
    Staff contracts are irrelevant to AI transparency disclosures and are not what deployers need to operate the system.
  4. The quarterly financial statements of the provider, published so that deployers can judge the vendor's stability before they commit to adopting the system.
    Financial statements concern corporate stability, not the technical transparency information the obligation requires for the AI system.
The trap
Equating AI transparency with open-sourcing code and model weights rather than providing documentation and usage instructions.

How to remember it

Instructions for use, technical documentation, and post-market monitoring plans are the transparency disclosures named in the objective.

How many of these would you get right?

One of 1581 AIGP questions on Certsqill. Take a free five-minute check and see your score per domain — not one number, but which section to open tonight.

Test your AIGP readiness — free

More Understanding How to Govern AI Development questions

Part of the Certsqill AIGP question bank · Understanding How to Govern AI Development · Every answer, right and wrong, comes with its own explanation.