Maintain technical documentation and publish: Under the EU AI | AIGP
7-day money-back guarantee — full refund within 7 days of purchase if you've completed under 20% of the questions. See pricing →
Certifications Tools Flashcards Career Paths Exam Guides Blog Pricing For Teams About

Language

✓ EnglishDeutschEspañolFrançaisPortuguês
Check readiness — free →

Maintain technical documentation and publish: Under the EU AI Act, which obligation applies to it as a

AIGP Understanding How Laws, Standards and Frameworks Apply to AI Medium

Every GPAI provider must maintain technical documentation and publish a sufficiently detailed summary of the training content, independent of any systemic-risk designation.

The question

A company places a general-purpose AI (GPAI) model on the EU market but the model is not designated as posing systemic risk. Under the EU AI Act, which obligation applies to it as a provider of a GPAI model?

Preparing for AIGP? Take the free 5-min readiness quiz →

  1. Perform state-of-the-art adversarial evaluation and promptly report every serious incident directly to the AI Office.
    Plausible but wrong: adversarial model evaluation and serious-incident reporting are additional obligations reserved for GPAI models with systemic risk, not the baseline for every GPAI provider.
  2. Register in the EU high-risk database and complete a full third-party conformity assessment before release.
    Plausible but wrong: database registration and conformity assessment are high-risk AI system obligations, a separate regime from the GPAI-model rules in Chapter V.
  3. Maintain technical documentation and publish a sufficiently detailed summary of the content used to train the model.
    Correct: all GPAI providers must keep technical documentation, pass information to downstream providers, adopt a copyright policy, and publish a sufficiently detailed training-data summary, regardless of systemic risk.
  4. Secure explicit opt-in consent from every individual whose personal data appears in the training set.
    Plausible but wrong: this conflates the AI Act with a GDPR-style consent requirement; the Act's GPAI baseline requires a training-data summary and copyright policy, not per-individual consent.
The trap
Believing systemic-risk or high-risk obligations apply to every GPAI model rather than only the baseline documentation and training-summary duties.

How to remember it

Every GPAI provider must maintain technical documentation and publish a sufficiently detailed summary of the training content, independent of any systemic-risk designation.

How many of these would you get right?

One of 1581 AIGP questions on Certsqill. Take a free five-minute check and see your score per domain — not one number, but which section to open tonight.

Test your AIGP readiness — free

More Understanding How Laws, Standards and Frameworks Apply to AI questions

Part of the Certsqill AIGP question bank · Understanding How Laws, Standards and Frameworks Apply to AI · Every answer, right and wrong, comes with its own explanation.