Analyze selection-rate disparities by protected group | AIGP
7-day money-back guarantee — full refund within 7 days of purchase if you've completed under 20% of the questions. See pricing →
Certifications Tools Flashcards Career Paths Exam Guides Blog Pricing For Teams About

Language

✓ EnglishDeutschEspañolFrançaisPortuguês
Check readiness — free →

Analyze selection-rate disparities by protected group: What is the most direct missing control for this

AIGP Understanding How Laws, Standards and Frameworks Apply to AI Hard

A neutral test can create disparate impact; selection-rate analysis is the direct missing control before drawing legal conclusions.

The question

Under US employment-selection law, a facially neutral screening model produces lower selection rates for one protected group. Job relatedness, business necessity, accommodation procedures, and intent-neutral administration are already documented. What is the most direct missing control for this employment-screening evidence?

Preparing for AIGP? Take the free 5-min readiness quiz →

  1. Seek evidence of intentional differential treatment.
    Intent evidence addresses disparate treatment, but the stated evidence primarily presents a possible disparate-impact pattern requiring outcome analysis.
  2. Analyze selection-rate disparities by protected group.
    Comparing selection rates directly tests whether the neutral procedure disproportionately excludes a protected group, triggering focused investigation and assessment.
  3. Replace the model with a manually administered screening process.
    Manual administration changes the tool but does not establish whether the existing neutral procedure creates disproportionate exclusion.
  4. Publish the model’s general fairness objective and vendor description.
    General transparency materials do not measure selection outcomes or determine whether protected-group exclusion is disproportionately occurring.
The trap
When neutral procedures produce unequal group outcomes, examine impact evidence before inferring discriminatory intent.

How to remember it

A neutral test can create disparate impact; selection-rate analysis is the direct missing control before drawing legal conclusions.

How many of these would you get right?

One of 1581 AIGP questions on Certsqill. Take a free five-minute check and see your score per domain — not one number, but which section to open tonight.

Test your AIGP readiness — free

More Understanding How Laws, Standards and Frameworks Apply to AI questions

Part of the Certsqill AIGP question bank · Understanding How Laws, Standards and Frameworks Apply to AI · Every answer, right and wrong, comes with its own explanation.